<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social engineering in comment spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pascal.vanhecke.info/2005/11/28/social-engineering-in-comment-spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pascal.vanhecke.info/2005/11/28/social-engineering-in-comment-spam/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 19:12:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CrystalsQuest</title>
		<link>http://pascal.vanhecke.info/2005/11/28/social-engineering-in-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-193237</link>
		<dc:creator>CrystalsQuest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 08:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pascal.vanhecke.info/2005/11/28/social-engineering-in-comment-spam/#comment-193237</guid>
		<description>I got a lot of those inane comments on my guestbook - and that was my first thought too.  Even the ones that don&#039;t have a direct link payload except for the one (and I check them) are usually left unmoderated for a while to think it over.

Interestingly, though, I&#039;ve also got a reverse issue - anyone who comments in russian gets picked up by the spam filter automatically.  I&#039;ve had a fair few russian commenters on one of my posts about wordpress 2.7 and the admin interface, and with a bit of google translate assistance, found they were legit - checking back to some of their sites I found they had comments that also bemoaned the fact that anything they commented with an .ru email or site got blocked automatically from any non ru domain.  I have to say so far I&#039;ve found they&#039;re right, although now I&#039;ve approved a few (I tend to paste the translation into the comment, except on that post which seems to be mostly getting traffic from those speakers anyway) I&#039;m now getting a lot more interest from the russian speaking community.

Thank heavens for Google Translate, is all I can say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got a lot of those inane comments on my guestbook &#8211; and that was my first thought too.  Even the ones that don&#8217;t have a direct link payload except for the one (and I check them) are usually left unmoderated for a while to think it over.</p>
<p>Interestingly, though, I&#8217;ve also got a reverse issue &#8211; anyone who comments in russian gets picked up by the spam filter automatically.  I&#8217;ve had a fair few russian commenters on one of my posts about wordpress 2.7 and the admin interface, and with a bit of google translate assistance, found they were legit &#8211; checking back to some of their sites I found they had comments that also bemoaned the fact that anything they commented with an .ru email or site got blocked automatically from any non ru domain.  I have to say so far I&#8217;ve found they&#8217;re right, although now I&#8217;ve approved a few (I tend to paste the translation into the comment, except on that post which seems to be mostly getting traffic from those speakers anyway) I&#8217;m now getting a lot more interest from the russian speaking community.</p>
<p>Thank heavens for Google Translate, is all I can say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goldpreise.biz</title>
		<link>http://pascal.vanhecke.info/2005/11/28/social-engineering-in-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-193175</link>
		<dc:creator>goldpreise.biz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pascal.vanhecke.info/2005/11/28/social-engineering-in-comment-spam/#comment-193175</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello I like your post “” so well that I like to ask you whether I should translate and linking back. Please give me an answer. Your Goldpreis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nice read at KesĂ¤maan pĂ¤ivĂ¤kirja</title>
		<link>http://pascal.vanhecke.info/2005/11/28/social-engineering-in-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-116385</link>
		<dc:creator>Nice read at KesĂ¤maan pĂ¤ivĂ¤kirja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 09:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pascal.vanhecke.info/2005/11/28/social-engineering-in-comment-spam/#comment-116385</guid>
		<description>[...] ja pĂ¤Ă¤dyin lopulta Notes, links and conversation -nimiseen blogiin. MerkinnĂ¤ssĂ¤Ă¤n &#8220;Social engineering in comment spam&#8221; kirjoittaja analysoi tismalleen samanlaista kommenttia. Ja nĂ¤htĂ¤vĂ¤sti miljoonat muutkin [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ja pĂ¤Ă¤dyin lopulta Notes, links and conversation -nimiseen blogiin. MerkinnĂ¤ssĂ¤Ă¤n &#8220;Social engineering in comment spam&#8221; kirjoittaja analysoi tismalleen samanlaista kommenttia. Ja nĂ¤htĂ¤vĂ¤sti miljoonat muutkin [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Pierce</title>
		<link>http://pascal.vanhecke.info/2005/11/28/social-engineering-in-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-29101</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Pierce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 03:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pascal.vanhecke.info/2005/11/28/social-engineering-in-comment-spam/#comment-29101</guid>
		<description>I got a few of these lately on my blog. I&#039;d approved two of them before I realised what was going on. I like your theory of whitelist manipulation, I put a link to this article on my blog I hope you don&#039;t mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got a few of these lately on my blog. I&#8217;d approved two of them before I realised what was going on. I like your theory of whitelist manipulation, I put a link to this article on my blog I hope you don&#8217;t mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Pierce &#187; Adam Brody - dirty spammer ?</title>
		<link>http://pascal.vanhecke.info/2005/11/28/social-engineering-in-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-29097</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Pierce &#187; Adam Brody - dirty spammer ?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 02:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pascal.vanhecke.info/2005/11/28/social-engineering-in-comment-spam/#comment-29097</guid>
		<description>[...] While reading up on this a little, I found another theory from Pascal van Hecke that these spams are to try and manipulate my blog&#8217;s whitelist so future spams can evade detection. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] While reading up on this a little, I found another theory from Pascal van Hecke that these spams are to try and manipulate my blog&#8217;s whitelist so future spams can evade detection. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pascal</title>
		<link>http://pascal.vanhecke.info/2005/11/28/social-engineering-in-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-16519</link>
		<dc:creator>Pascal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 07:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pascal.vanhecke.info/2005/11/28/social-engineering-in-comment-spam/#comment-16519</guid>
		<description>Very funny Mr Lowerdown, but not really original :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very funny Mr Lowerdown, but not really original :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D00d</title>
		<link>http://pascal.vanhecke.info/2005/11/28/social-engineering-in-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-16517</link>
		<dc:creator>D00d</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 07:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pascal.vanhecke.info/2005/11/28/social-engineering-in-comment-spam/#comment-16517</guid>
		<description>I googled for something completely different, but found your pageâ€¦ and have to say thanks. nice read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I googled for something completely different, but found your pageâ€¦ and have to say thanks. nice read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://pascal.vanhecke.info/2005/11/28/social-engineering-in-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-12991</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 21:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pascal.vanhecke.info/2005/11/28/social-engineering-in-comment-spam/#comment-12991</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;The bloggerâ€™s egoâ€¦ the weakest spot in comment spam protection.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Wow, you said a mouthful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;The bloggerâ€™s egoâ€¦ the weakest spot in comment spam protection.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Wow, you said a mouthful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vit Brunner</title>
		<link>http://pascal.vanhecke.info/2005/11/28/social-engineering-in-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>Vit Brunner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 19:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pascal.vanhecke.info/2005/11/28/social-engineering-in-comment-spam/#comment-284</guid>
		<description>Oh... what a nice idea... can I try it here? ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh&#8230; what a nice idea&#8230; can I try it here? ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Kohler</title>
		<link>http://pascal.vanhecke.info/2005/11/28/social-engineering-in-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Kohler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pascal.vanhecke.info/2005/11/28/social-engineering-in-comment-spam/#comment-193</guid>
		<description>Clearly, spammers don&#039;t have to be too sophisticated with their spamming tactics because the average blog owner will easily approve such comments. They obviously put some thought into getting inside the mind of a blog owner, which probably has increased their approval rate, but taking the time to build credibility with blog owners simply isn&#039;t necessarily for achieving the results they&#039;re after.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly, spammers don&#8217;t have to be too sophisticated with their spamming tactics because the average blog owner will easily approve such comments. They obviously put some thought into getting inside the mind of a blog owner, which probably has increased their approval rate, but taking the time to build credibility with blog owners simply isn&#8217;t necessarily for achieving the results they&#8217;re after.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

