<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oomph for Firefox: Microsoft&#8217;s Microformats IE plugin as Greasemonkey script</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pascal.vanhecke.info/2008/11/13/oomph-for-firefox-microsofts-microformats-ie-plugin-as-greasemonkey-script/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pascal.vanhecke.info/2008/11/13/oomph-for-firefox-microsofts-microformats-ie-plugin-as-greasemonkey-script/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:22:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alenônimo</title>
		<link>http://pascal.vanhecke.info/2008/11/13/oomph-for-firefox-microsofts-microformats-ie-plugin-as-greasemonkey-script/comment-page-1/#comment-193375</link>
		<dc:creator>Alenônimo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 03:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pascal.vanhecke.info/2008/11/13/oomph-for-firefox-microsofts-microformats-ie-plugin-as-greasemonkey-script/#comment-193375</guid>
		<description>The Greasemonkey script should include pages starting with &quot;file:///&quot; too. So we can test Microformats while editing them on our PCs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Greasemonkey script should include pages starting with &#8220;file:///&#8221; too. So we can test Microformats while editing them on our PCs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pascal</title>
		<link>http://pascal.vanhecke.info/2008/11/13/oomph-for-firefox-microsofts-microformats-ie-plugin-as-greasemonkey-script/comment-page-1/#comment-193319</link>
		<dc:creator>Pascal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pascal.vanhecke.info/2008/11/13/oomph-for-firefox-microsofts-microformats-ie-plugin-as-greasemonkey-script/#comment-193319</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment.

I&#039;m not a Microsoft guy however, I just came up with this Greasemonkey script that includes the javascript snippet provided by MS automatically.

I knew there were some issues with microformats and accessibility ( http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/radiolabs/2008/06/removing_microformats_from_bbc.shtml ) and some googling learned that some people tried to come up with a solution for it http://www.webstandards.org/2007/04/27/haccessibility/ (I understand that&#039;s what you are referring to?).

A good place to voice your concerns would probably be the http://windowslivewriter.spaces.live.com/ Windows Live Writer team blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a Microsoft guy however, I just came up with this Greasemonkey script that includes the javascript snippet provided by MS automatically.</p>
<p>I knew there were some issues with microformats and accessibility ( <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/radiolabs/2008/06/removing_microformats_from_bbc.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/radiolabs/2008/06/removing_microformats_from_bbc.shtml</a> ) and some googling learned that some people tried to come up with a solution for it <a href="http://www.webstandards.org/2007/04/27/haccessibility/" rel="nofollow">http://www.webstandards.org/2007/04/27/haccessibility/</a> (I understand that&#8217;s what you are referring to?).</p>
<p>A good place to voice your concerns would probably be the <a href="http://windowslivewriter.spaces.live.com/" rel="nofollow">http://windowslivewriter.spaces.live.com/</a> Windows Live Writer team blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://pascal.vanhecke.info/2008/11/13/oomph-for-firefox-microsofts-microformats-ie-plugin-as-greasemonkey-script/comment-page-1/#comment-193317</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pascal.vanhecke.info/2008/11/13/oomph-for-firefox-microsofts-microformats-ie-plugin-as-greasemonkey-script/#comment-193317</guid>
		<description>I think this is brilliant: a cross-browser tool that takes advantage of microformats. It works great and looks great.

My only concern is the plugin for Windows Live Writer. It enables people to include the hCalendar microformat in their blog using the standard format (i.e. using the title of abbr). This method of using hCalendar raises accessibility concerns: how it affects people with visual and cognitive disabilities.

I hope you can come up with a solution to this problem, because what you&#039;ve achieved so far is quite exciting :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is brilliant: a cross-browser tool that takes advantage of microformats. It works great and looks great.</p>
<p>My only concern is the plugin for Windows Live Writer. It enables people to include the hCalendar microformat in their blog using the standard format (i.e. using the title of abbr). This method of using hCalendar raises accessibility concerns: how it affects people with visual and cognitive disabilities.</p>
<p>I hope you can come up with a solution to this problem, because what you&#8217;ve achieved so far is quite exciting :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Allen [msft]</title>
		<link>http://pascal.vanhecke.info/2008/11/13/oomph-for-firefox-microsofts-microformats-ie-plugin-as-greasemonkey-script/comment-page-1/#comment-193063</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Allen [msft]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 06:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pascal.vanhecke.info/2008/11/13/oomph-for-firefox-microsofts-microformats-ie-plugin-as-greasemonkey-script/#comment-193063</guid>
		<description>@Frank: It is true that we arrived late at the party :-)  I think Michael Kaply&#039;s &quot;Operator&quot; for Firefox is the most mature and developed plugin out there, and we recommend his plugin for people using Firefox.  But Pascal&#039;s greasemonkey script is quite cool.  I have been using it in Google Chrome for the past couple of weeks (I use Chrome as a &quot;backup browser&quot;, and the daily builds support greasemonkey scripts).  It&#039;s really remarkable to see the gleam appear just as I expect, no matter whether I am using Chrome or IE.

@Pascal: Thanks again for doing this; we linked from our blog and I have been giving shout-outs.  We just did some bugfixes and re-built the installer, but you are right about the possible issues with installing the greasemonkey extension.  I could technically have the installer check to see if Chrome is installed, and then drop the .js file in the appropriate folder (with user permission of course), but I didn&#039;t see a way to do the same in Firefox.  I&#039;m very tempted to just add the support for Chrome in the next build of the installer, but need to think it through a bit more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Frank: It is true that we arrived late at the party :-)  I think Michael Kaply&#8217;s &#8220;Operator&#8221; for Firefox is the most mature and developed plugin out there, and we recommend his plugin for people using Firefox.  But Pascal&#8217;s greasemonkey script is quite cool.  I have been using it in Google Chrome for the past couple of weeks (I use Chrome as a &#8220;backup browser&#8221;, and the daily builds support greasemonkey scripts).  It&#8217;s really remarkable to see the gleam appear just as I expect, no matter whether I am using Chrome or IE.</p>
<p>@Pascal: Thanks again for doing this; we linked from our blog and I have been giving shout-outs.  We just did some bugfixes and re-built the installer, but you are right about the possible issues with installing the greasemonkey extension.  I could technically have the installer check to see if Chrome is installed, and then drop the .js file in the appropriate folder (with user permission of course), but I didn&#8217;t see a way to do the same in Firefox.  I&#8217;m very tempted to just add the support for Chrome in the next build of the installer, but need to think it through a bit more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://pascal.vanhecke.info/2008/11/13/oomph-for-firefox-microsofts-microformats-ie-plugin-as-greasemonkey-script/comment-page-1/#comment-193038</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pascal.vanhecke.info/2008/11/13/oomph-for-firefox-microsofts-microformats-ie-plugin-as-greasemonkey-script/#comment-193038</guid>
		<description>For those using Safari, there is the Safari Microformats plugin at http://zappatic.net/safarimicroformats/ that works quite well as well, and has been around for quite a bit longer than the IE one :) It integrates nicely with iCal and AddressBook (if you are using OSX, no idea what it does on Safari for Windows)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those using Safari, there is the Safari Microformats plugin at <a href="http://zappatic.net/safarimicroformats/" rel="nofollow">http://zappatic.net/safarimicroformats/</a> that works quite well as well, and has been around for quite a bit longer than the IE one :) It integrates nicely with iCal and AddressBook (if you are using OSX, no idea what it does on Safari for Windows)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pascal</title>
		<link>http://pascal.vanhecke.info/2008/11/13/oomph-for-firefox-microsofts-microformats-ie-plugin-as-greasemonkey-script/comment-page-1/#comment-193037</link>
		<dc:creator>Pascal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 07:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pascal.vanhecke.info/2008/11/13/oomph-for-firefox-microsofts-microformats-ie-plugin-as-greasemonkey-script/#comment-193037</guid>
		<description>hello Joshua,

no blogger has ever complained about an incoming link ;-)

as for including the script in the Oomph installer: I have no clue at all what the legal status of a contribution at userscripts.org is and whether you&#039;d need permission to include a script trivial as this http://userscripts.org/scripts/review/36879 ...  

FWIW, you have my permission, but I guess the bigger challenge for you will be to redistribute the Firefox Greasemonkey extension, so I&#039;m not sure it&#039;s worth the hassle?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello Joshua,</p>
<p>no blogger has ever complained about an incoming link ;-)</p>
<p>as for including the script in the Oomph installer: I have no clue at all what the legal status of a contribution at userscripts.org is and whether you&#8217;d need permission to include a script trivial as this <a href="http://userscripts.org/scripts/review/36879" rel="nofollow">http://userscripts.org/scripts/review/36879</a> &#8230;  </p>
<p>FWIW, you have my permission, but I guess the bigger challenge for you will be to redistribute the Firefox Greasemonkey extension, so I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s worth the hassle?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Allen [msft]</title>
		<link>http://pascal.vanhecke.info/2008/11/13/oomph-for-firefox-microsofts-microformats-ie-plugin-as-greasemonkey-script/comment-page-1/#comment-193034</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Allen [msft]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 04:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pascal.vanhecke.info/2008/11/13/oomph-for-firefox-microsofts-microformats-ie-plugin-as-greasemonkey-script/#comment-193034</guid>
		<description>Whoa, this is fantastic!  We had someone contribute a bookmarklet for Google Chrome, but you are right -- this just makes sense as GreaseMonkey script.

Do you mind if we link to this from our CodePlex site?  FWIW, *all* of our source is released as Ms-Pl (basically BSD/MIT license) and we take code contributions, so if you wanted to check this into the project, we would be happy to bundle it with the installer for Oomph.  But totally up to you -- we would love to at least point to the script on your site.

Cheers,
Joshua</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa, this is fantastic!  We had someone contribute a bookmarklet for Google Chrome, but you are right &#8212; this just makes sense as GreaseMonkey script.</p>
<p>Do you mind if we link to this from our CodePlex site?  FWIW, *all* of our source is released as Ms-Pl (basically BSD/MIT license) and we take code contributions, so if you wanted to check this into the project, we would be happy to bundle it with the installer for Oomph.  But totally up to you &#8212; we would love to at least point to the script on your site.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Joshua</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
